Menteri
Luar Rusia Sergey Lavrov. (Screenshot daripada Channel 1 Time programme 1 Ahad) (Screenshot from Channel 1 Sunday Time
programme - think IN pictures @1WORLDCommunity)
N.nizah – (RT.
Published time: 09:48 September 22, 2013) Lavrov: US mendesak Rusia meluluskan
resolusi PBB ke atas Syria di bawah Bab 7. Amerika Syarikat menolak Rusia ke
dalam meluluskan resolusi PBB yang akan membolehkan untuk campur tangan
ketenteraan di Syria, sebagai pertukaran untuk sokongan Amerika kesertaan Syria
untuk OPCW, Menteri Luar Rusia Sergey Lavrov berkata.
“Rakan-rakan
Amerika mula memeras ugut kami: ‘Jika Rusia tidak menyokong resolusi di bawah
Bab 7, maka kami akan menarik balik sokongan kami untuk masuk ke Syria
Pertubuhan bagi Larangan Senjata Kimia (OPCW). Ini adalah berlepas lengkap dari
apa yang saya bersetuju dengan Setiausaha Negara John Kerry’, “kata Menteri
Luar Rusia Sergey Lavrov memberitahu Channel 1 Ahad Time program.
Bab
7 Piagam PBB akan membolehkan campur tangan tentera yang berpotensi di Syria.
Negara-negara
Barat buta oleh 'Assad mesti pergi
kerana tingkahlaku
Ketua
Kementerian Luar Rusia seterusnya berkata beliau terkejut dengan pendekatan
Barat “cuai” kepada konflik.
“Rakan-rakan
kami buta dengan misi ideologi untuk perubahan rejim,” kata Lavrov. “Mereka
tidak boleh mengakui bahawa mereka telah membuat kesilapan yang lain.”
Menghempas
campur tangan Barat di Libya dan Iraq, Menteri Luar menyatakan bahawa campur
tangan tentera sahaja boleh membawa kepada malapetaka di rantau ini. Selain
itu, beliau menegaskan bahawa jika Barat benar-benar adalah berminat dalam
penyelesaian secara aman kepada konflik yang telah berlarutan selama lebih 2
tahun, mereka akan kini boleh menolak untuk masuk Syria ke OPCW di tempat yang
pertama, bukan untuk penyingkiran Presiden Bashar Assad.
“Saya
yakin bahawa Barat lakukan ini untuk menunjukkan bahawa mereka memanggil
tembakan di Timur Tengah. Ini adalah satu pendekatan yang benar-benar
dipolitikkan,” kata Lavrov.
‘Mengulangi
Geneva 2012’
Lavrov
mengimbas kembali kepada perjanjian Geneva tahun lepas yang telah dipersetujui
oleh masyarakat antarabangsa, termasuk Rusia dan Amerika Syarikat. Walau
bagaimanapun, apabila ketetapan itu pergi kepada Majlis Keselamatan Amerika
Syarikat menuntut Bab 7 dimasukkan.
“Sejarah
adalah mengulangi sendiri. Sekali lagi di Geneva perjanjian telah dicapai yang
tidak mengandungi apa-apa sebutan dalam Bab 7. Tetapi Majlis Keselamatan mahu
buat semula dokumen itu dengan cara mereka sendiri untuk memasukkan ia.”
Beliau
menggesa Barat untuk mematuhi undang-undang antarabangsa dan berhenti menulis
resolusi didorong “cita-cita geopolitik” oleh mereka.
‘Kedua-dua
pihak perlu menyerahkan senjata kimia’
Sergey
Lavrov juga telah menegaskan bahawa pihak pembangkang mengambil bahagian dalam
pelucutan tauliah stok simpanan senjata kimia di Syria.
“Penyelesaian
yang sedang bekerja di OPCW mencadangkan bahawa semua stok senjata kimia Syria
mesti dibawa di bawah kawalan dan akhirnya dimusnahkan.”
Lavrov
lagi mendakwa bahawa Barat adalah “tidak memberitahu seluruh kisah ini” dengan
menyatakan bahawa senjata kimia hanya dimiliki oleh rejim, dan bukan
pembangkang.
Beliau
menambah bahawa maklumat yang disediakan oleh Israel mengesahkan bahawa
sekurang-kurangnya 2 kali, pemberontak telah merampas kawasan-kawasan di mana
senjata kimia telah disimpan dan senjata mereka mungkin telah jatuh ke tangan
mereka.
“Menurut
anggaran kami, ada kemungkinan yang kuat bahawa di samping makmal rumah
tempatan di mana militan cuba untuk memasak ramuan yang membahayakan dan
berbahaya, data yang disediakan oleh Israel adalah benar,” kata Rusia FM.
“Kerja
Persediaan untuk pemeriksa OPCW untuk mengambil alih kawalan laman kimia
penyimpanan senjata memerlukan orang-orang yang membiayai dan menaja kumpulan
pembangkang - termasuk pelampau - permintaan mereka menyerahkan [tangan] yang
telah disita supaya mereka boleh memusnahkannya, menurut Konvensyen tentang
Larangan Senjata Kimia.”
Lavrov
berkata bahawa Rusia tidak penjamin seorang bagi pelucutan senjata kimia di
Syria, sebagai komitmen Syria jatuh di bawah naungan Konvensyen Senjata Kimia,
yang di peringkat antarabangsa yang ditadbir oleh OPCW itu.
Lavrov
berkata, Rusia dan Amerika Syarikat telah bekerja di luar draf resolusi yang
akan dikemukakan kepada OPCW, walaupun beberapa perkara masih belum dipersetujui.
Logistik
kemusnahan
Sergey
Lavrov berkata bahawa tempoh masa bagi penghapusan senjata kimia Syria tidak
realistik.
“Sebahagian
besar daripada angka-angka sebagai satu masa, panjang, permulaan, penamat misi
telah dicadangkan oleh pihak Amerika,” katanya.
Walaupun
tempoh masa yang boleh dilaksanakan, masih ada perbezaan pendapat mengenai kos
usaha.
Awal
minggu ini, Presiden Assad berkata kemusnahan senjata senjata kimia di Syria
akan menjadi satu usaha yang mahal.
“Ia
memerlukan banyak wang, ia memerlukan kira-kira 1 bilion [dolar Amerika Syarikat].
Ia amat memudaratkan alam sekitar. Jika pentadbiran Amerika bersedia untuk
membayar wang itu, dan mengambil tanggungjawab untuk membawa bahan-bahan toksik
ke Amerika Syarikat, mengapa mereka tidak melakukannya?” Assad memberitahu Fox
News
Lavrov
berkata beliau telah mendengar tentang anggaran kos, walaupun semasa rundingan
dengan rakan sejawatannya dari Amerika Syarikat di Geneva minggu lepas, angka
itu jauh lebih rendah. Lavrov berkata perbezaan berpunca daripada hakikat
bahawa anggaran yang profesional adalah teratur.
“Apabila
pakar OPCW melawat Syria dan melihat laman yang menyimpan senjata kimia, mereka
akan memahami apa yang boleh dimusnahkan di tempat kejadian (dan ini juga
boleh) dengan penggunaan peralatan mudah alih yang beberapa negeri mempunyai,
dan orang-orang di mana kilang-kilang khas perlu dibina, seperti yang kita
lakukan apabila memusnahkan stok simpanan senjata kimia Soviet. Tetapi bagi
mereka yang perlu dibawa keluar dari negara ini - bahan-bahan toksik - akan
memerlukan satu keputusan yang istimewa, kerana konvensyen itu menganggap ia
penting bahawa kemusnahan yang berlaku di wilayah negara itu yang memiliki
senjata kimia,” katanya.
Lavrov
berkata alasan undang-undang perlu didapati untuk bergerak ke hadapan dalam kes
ini, tetapi jika semua pihak boleh bersetuju pada dasarnya, kemudian merangka
dokumen yang mengikat secara sah tidak akan menjadi keras.
Beliau
juga berkata masalah yang akan dihadapi dalam memastikan keselamatan kedua-dua
pakar-pakar Syria dan antarabangsa ditugaskan untuk membawa senjata kimia di
bawah kawalan dan meletakkan asas bagi pemusnahan utama mereka.
“Kami
menganggap bahawa kehadiran antarabangsa akan menuntut di kawasan-kawasan di
mana pakar-pakar yang bekerja. Kami bersedia untuk memperuntukkan askar kita
sendiri atau polis tentera untuk mengambil bahagian dalam usaha-usaha ini. Saya
tidak percaya ia adalah perlu untuk menghantar yang kuat [tentera] kontingensi].
Ia seolah-olah bahawa ia akan mencukupi untuk menghantar pemerhati tentera. Ia
akan menjadi perlu untuk melakukannya dalam apa-apa cara yang pemerhati akan
datang dari semua anggota tetap Majlis Keselamatan PBB, negara-negara Arab dan
Turki, supaya semua pihak yang bercanggah di Syria faham bahawa kontinjen ini
mewakili semua kuasa-kuasa luar yang bekerjasama dengan satu atau pihak lain
yang bercanggah di Syria . . . supaya mereka tidak mengambil tindakan
provokasi,” katanya.
Lavrov
mengulangi kenyataan dahulu yang dibuat semasa rundingan dengan Setiausaha
Negara John Kerry berikutan rundingan mereka di Geneva minggu lepas bahawa
pembangkang adalah sama-sama bertanggungjawab untuk menyediakan untuk
keselamatan OPCW dan pakar-pakar PBB di negara ini dan tidak membenarkan
mana-mana “provokasi”.
Lavrov:
US pressuring Russia into passing UN resolution on Syria under Chapter 7. The
US is pushing Russia into approving a UN resolution that would allow for
military intervention in Syria, in exchange for American support of Syria’s
accession to OPCW, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said.
“Our
American partners are starting to blackmail us: ‘If Russia does not support a
resolution under Chapter 7, then we will withdraw our support for Syria’s entry
into the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). This is a
complete departure from what I agreed with Secretary of State John Kerry',”
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told Channel 1's Sunday Time program.
Chapter
7 of the UN charter would allow for potential military intervention in Syria.
Western
countries blinded by 'Assad must go' Attitude
The
head of Russia’s Foreign Ministry went on to say he was surprised by the West’s
“negligent” approach to the conflict.
“Our
partners are blinded by an ideological mission for regime change,” said Lavrov.
“They cannot admit they have made another mistake.”
Slamming
the West’s intervention in Libya and Iraq, the foreign minister stated that
military intervention could only lead to a catastrophe in the region. Moreover,
he stressed that if the West really was interested in a peaceful solution to
the conflict that has raged for over two years, they would now be pushing for
Syria’s entry into the OPCW in the first place, not for the ouster of President
Bashar Assad.
“I
am convinced that the West is doing this to demonstrate that they call the
shots in the Middle East. This is a totally politicized approach,” said Lavrov.
'A
repeat of Geneva 2012'
Lavrov
harked back to last year’s Geneva accord which was agreed upon by the
international community, including Russia and the US. However, when the
resolution went to the Security Council the US demanded that Chapter 7 be
included.
“History
is repeating itself. Once again in Geneva an agreement has been reached which
does not contain any mention of Chapter 7. But the Security Council wants to
redo the document in their own way to include it.”
He
called on the West to observe international law and stop writing resolutions
motivated by their “geopolitical ambitions.”
‘Both
sides must hand over chemical weapons’
Sergey
Lavrov has also insisted that opposition forces take part in the decommissioning
of Syria’s chemical weapons stockpiles.
“The
solutions currently being worked out at the OPCW suggest that all stocks of
Syrian chemical weapons must be brought under control and ultimately
destroyed.”
Lavrov
further charged that the West was “not telling the whole story” by asserting
that chemical weapons are only possessed by the regime, and not the opposition.
He
added that the available information provided by the Israelis confirmed that on
at least two occasions, the rebels had seized areas in which chemical weapons
were stored and those arms might have fallen into their hands.
"According
to our estimates, there is a strong probability that in addition to home-grown
labs in which militants are trying to cook up harmful and deadly concoctions,
the data provided by the Israelis is true,” the Russian FM said.
“Preparatory
work for OPCW inspectors to assume control of chemical weapons storage sites
requires that those who fund and sponsor opposition groups – including extremists – demand that they hand over the [arms] which
have been seized so that they can be destroyed, pursuant to the Convention on
the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.”
Lavrov
added that Russia was not a guarantor for the disarmament of Syria’s chemical
weapons, as Syria’s commitments fell under the auspices of the Chemical Weapons
Convention, which is internationally administered by the OPCW.
Lavrov
said Russia and the US were working out a draft resolution to be submitted to
the OPCW, although several points were yet to be agreed upon.
Logistics
of destruction
Sergey
Lavrov said that the time frame for the elimination of Syria’s chemical weapons
was not unrealistic.
"The
overwhelming majority of the figures as per timing, term, beginning, finishing
of the mission have been suggested by the American side," he added.
Even
if the time frame is feasible, there remains disagreement on the cost of the
venture.
Earlier
this week, President Assad said the destruction of Syria’s chemical weapons
arsenal would be a costly venture.
“It
needs a lot of money, it needs about one billion [US dollars]. It’s very
detrimental to the environment. If the American administration is ready to pay
the money, and to take responsibility of bringing toxic materials to the United
States, why don’t they do it?” Assad told Fox News
Lavrov
said he had heard of the cost estimate, although during his negotiations with
his US counterpart in Geneva last week, the figure was much lower. Lavrov said
the discrepancy stemmed from the fact that a professional estimate was in
order.
“When
OPCW experts visit Syria and view the storage sites for chemical weapons, they
will understand what can be destroyed on the spot (and this is also possible)
with the use of mobile equipment which a number of states have, and those where
special factories need to be built, as we did when destroying Soviet chemical
weapons stockpiles. But for those which need to be taken out of the country –
toxic substances – will require a special decision, because the convention
considers it essential that the destruction takes place on the territory of
that country which possesses the chemical weapons,” he said.
Lavrov
said legal grounds would need to be found to move forward in this case, but if
all sides could agree in principle, then drawing up a legally binding document
will not be hard.
He
further noted the difficulties that would be faced in assuring the security of
both the Syrian and international experts tasked with bringing the chemical
weapons under control and laying the groundwork for their ultimate destruction.
“We’ve
considered that an international presence will be demanded in those areas where
experts are working. We are prepared to allocate our own servicemen or military
police to take part in those efforts. I do not believe it is necessary to send
in a strong [military] contingency.] It seems to me that it will be sufficient
to send in military observers. It will be necessary to do it in such a way that
the observers will come from all permanent members of the UN Security Council,
Arab states and Turkey, so that all conflicting sides in Syria understand that
this contingent represents all external forces who are collaborating with one
or the other conflicting sides in Syria . . . so that they don’t resort to
provocations,” he said.
Lavrov
reiterated previous statements made during his negotiations with Secretary of
State John Kerry following their talks in Geneva last week that the opposition
was equally responsible for providing for the safety of OPCW and UN experts in
the country and not allowing for any “provocations.”
No comments:
Post a Comment